In seconds Caira can draft statements and review documents from the other party. Chat to her 24/7: https://caira.unwildered.co.uk

Rape is one of the most emotionally charged and misunderstood crimes. Many people imagine it as a violent attack by a stranger, but in reality, most rapes happen between people who know each other—sometimes even in the context of a relationship or a night out. This can make it incredibly confusing for victims, especially if they “went along with it” out of fear, shock, or simply not knowing how to say no.

It’s common to question yourself: “Did I make it clear I didn’t want this?” “If I didn’t fight back, does that mean I consented?” “Why did I text him afterwards?” These doubts are normal, but the law in England and Wales is clear: consent must be given freely, without coercion, pressure, or fear. Submission is not the same as consent.

The courts in England and Wales are aware that trauma, shock, and social pressure can lead people to behave in ways that don’t fit the “movie script” of what people think rape looks like. This is why evidence, context, and understanding the law are so important.

2. What Is Consent? The Legal Test

Consent is at the heart of every rape case. Legally, under the Sexual Offences Act 2003, a person consents if they agree by choice, and have the freedom and capacity to make that choice. This means:

• Agreement by Choice: There must be a positive, voluntary agreement to engage in the sexual activity. Silence, passivity, or “going along with it” because you feel you have no other option is not consent.

• Freedom to Choose: If someone is threatened, manipulated, or feels unable to say no (for example, because they’re scared or intimidated), the law says they are not free to make a real choice.

• Capacity to Choose: If someone is too drunk, drugged, asleep, or otherwise unable to understand what’s happening, they cannot legally consent.

Example: If a person says “yes” because they’re frightened of what might happen if they say “no,” that is not true consent. If someone is so intoxicated that they can’t understand what’s happening, any sexual activity is likely to be rape.

The law also recognises that people may “freeze” or comply out of fear. Submission under pressure is not the same as agreement. The courts will look at all the circumstances, including what was said, done, and the context.

Difference between rape and sexual assault - UK

Rape is defined under the Sexual Offences Act 2003 as when a person intentionally penetrates another’s vagina, anus, or mouth with their penis without the other person’s consent, and without reasonably believing that they consent.

• This means rape always involves penile penetration—whether vaginal, anal, or oral.

• If someone is forced, threatened, or unable to consent due to intoxication, sleep, or incapacity, and penetration occurs, it is legally considered rape.

Sexual assault covers a wider range of non-consensual sexual acts that do not involve penile penetration.

• This includes being forced to give or receive oral sex (if not involving a penis), being made to perform a handjob, being touched sexually without consent, or being penetrated with fingers or objects.

• For example, if someone is forced to masturbate another person, is touched sexually without agreement, or is penetrated with fingers or an object, this is sexual assault—not rape.

Where is the line?

• If the act involves a penis penetrating the vagina, anus, or mouth, it is rape.

• If the act involves other forms of sexual touching, penetration with fingers or objects, or forced sexual acts that do not involve penile penetration, it is sexual assault.

Both rape and sexual assault are serious criminal offences. The difference lies in the specific act and the part of the body involved. In all cases, the absence of free, informed, and voluntary consent is what makes the act a crime

3. Devil’s Advocate: Common Defences and How Courts Approach Them

Defendants often raise arguments that play on common misunderstandings about consent and victim behaviour. Here are some examples, and how courts are instructed to approach them:

• “She texted me after, so it can’t be rape.”
  Courts are aware that victims may contact the perpetrator after the event for many reasons—seeking closure, trying to normalise what happened, or even out of fear. Judges are now expected to warn themselves against relying on “rape myths” like the idea that a “real” victim would cut off all contact.

  
  

• “We both drank, so how can anyone be sure?”
  Alcohol complicates things, but it doesn’t excuse rape. The key question is whether the complainant had the capacity to consent and whether the defendant reasonably believed there was consent. If both parties were drunk, the court will look at who was more affected, what was said and done, and whether there was a genuine agreement.

  
  

• “She brought the alcohol, does that mean she wanted sex?”
  Bringing alcohol, flirting, or even agreeing to go home with someone is not consent to sex. The court will focus on what happened at the time of the sexual activity, not what led up to it.

  
  

• “She didn’t say no, but did she say yes?”
  The absence of a “no” is not the same as a “yes.” The law requires positive agreement. Courts are instructed to look for evidence of active, free participation—not just the absence of resistance.

Technical Note: The Crown Court Compendium and Equal Treatment Bench Book both instruct judges to address these myths and stereotypes directly, reminding juries that trauma can cause victims to behave in ways that might seem odd or inconsistent.

4. The Importance of Evidence—Before, During, and After

Evidence is the backbone of any rape case. Because these cases often come down to one person’s word against another’s, courts look for anything that can shed light on what happened and the state of mind of both parties. This includes:

• Text messages, emails, WhatsApp, DM’s and social media: Communications before and after the incident can show the nature of the relationship, expectations, and reactions. For example, messages expressing distress, confusion, or seeking help can support a complainant’s account. However, messages that appear friendly or neutral after the event do not automatically mean consent was given—courts are aware that trauma can lead to a range of responses.

  
  

• Medical evidence: If a complainant seeks medical help, records of injuries, distress, or forensic evidence can be important. However, the absence of physical injury does not mean rape did not occur.

  
  

• Witness statements: Friends, family, or others who saw the complainant before or after the incident can provide context—such as changes in behaviour, emotional state, or disclosures made soon after.

  
  

• Contemporaneous notes or diary entries: If you wrote down what happened, or told someone you trust, this can help show consistency in your account.

Courts understand that trauma, shock, or intoxication can affect memory and behaviour. Inconsistencies in detail do not automatically undermine credibility, but the overall reliability and plausibility of the account are considered.

5. Proving Patterns: Similar Fact Evidence

Sometimes, a complainant alleges that the accused has a history of controlling, violent, or sexually aggressive behaviour. The law does allow for evidence of past behaviour—known as “similar fact evidence”—to be admitted, but only in specific circumstances.

• Relevance and necessity: The court must be persuaded that evidence of past incidents is directly relevant to the issues in the current case. For example, if there is a pattern of coercive or violent behaviour, this may help show that the accused’s actions were not a one-off or accidental.

  
  

• Application process: If you wish to rely on evidence of the accused’s behaviour towards others, a written application must usually be made in advance, supported by a witness statement explaining why it is relevant. The court will decide whether to allow it, often at a case management hearing.

  
  

• Limits: You cannot simply accuse someone of being “scary” or violent without evidence. The court will look for police reports, previous complaints, messages, or other witnesses who can corroborate the pattern.

The Court of Appeal in R v P (Children: Similar Fact Evidence) [2020] EWCA Civ 1088 confirmed that the test is one of relevance and necessity. The court must have the best evidence to illuminate subtle and persistent patterns of behaviour, especially in cases involving coercive control or harassment.

6. How Courts Weigh Evidence and Patterns

When considering evidence, courts look at the whole picture. They weigh:

• Consistency and plausibility: Is the complainant’s account broadly consistent over time? Are there plausible explanations for any inconsistencies?

• Corroboration: Is there independent evidence—such as messages, medical records, or witnesses—that supports the account?

• Pattern of behaviour: If similar fact evidence is admitted, does it show a pattern that makes the complainant’s account more likely?

• Defendant’s explanation: The accused will have the opportunity to explain their actions and respond to the allegations. The court will consider whether their account is credible and consistent with the evidence.

Ultimately, the prosecution must prove beyond reasonable doubt that there was no consent and that the accused did not reasonably believe there was consent. The presence of a pattern can strengthen the case, but each allegation must still be proved on its own facts.

7. Challenges for Victims

Victims of rape often face a daunting journey, both emotionally and legally. Some of the main challenges include:

• Self-blame and confusion: Many victims question their own actions—wondering if they were clear enough, if they should have fought harder, or if their behaviour afterwards will be misunderstood. Trauma can cause people to freeze, comply, or even try to “normalise” what happened by contacting the perpetrator later. None of these responses mean that consent was given.

  
  

• Delayed reporting: It’s common for victims to delay telling anyone or reporting to the police. Fear of not being believed, shame, or simply needing time to process what happened are all normal. Courts are increasingly aware that delayed reporting does not mean an allegation is false.

  
  

• Fear of not being believed: The adversarial nature of court can be intimidating. Victims may worry that inconsistencies in their account, gaps in memory, or later contact with the accused will be used against them. However, judges are now expected to remind themselves and juries that trauma can affect memory and behaviour in complex ways.

Victims are encouraged to keep any evidence they have—messages, notes, or records of how they felt—and to seek support if needed. The process can be long and emotionally draining, but your experience is valid.

8. Challenges for Defendants

Those accused of rape also face significant challenges, given the seriousness of the allegation and the impact on their reputation and life. Key points include:

• Presumption of innocence: In criminal law, every defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty. The prosecution must prove the case beyond reasonable doubt.

  
  

• Difficulty disproving an allegation: Rape cases often occur in private, with little or no physical evidence. Defendants may feel it’s impossible to prove their innocence, especially if there are no witnesses or if messages after the event are open to interpretation.

  
  

• Character evidence and previous behaviour: If there is credible evidence of a pattern of similar behaviour, this can be admitted in court. However, the court must be satisfied that it is relevant and not simply prejudicial. Defendants have the right to challenge the admission of such evidence and to present their own account.

The process can be stressful and isolating for both parties. Courts aim to ensure fairness, but the emotional toll is real.

9. Rape Myths and Court Warnings

Historically, courts and juries have sometimes relied on stereotypes or “rape myths”—such as the belief that a “real” victim would always fight back, never contact the perpetrator again, or would report immediately. These myths are now explicitly addressed in court.

• Judicial warnings: Judges are expected to warn themselves and juries not to rely on myths or stereotypes. For example, the Equal Treatment Bench Book and Crown Court Compendium provide guidance on the types of myths that can arise, such as assumptions about victim behaviour, intoxication, or delayed reporting.

  
  

• Trauma-informed approach: Courts are increasingly aware that trauma can cause a range of responses, including compliance, delayed reporting, or inconsistent accounts. These do not mean that an allegation is false.

  
  

• Focus on evidence: The court’s role is to assess the evidence, not to judge based on how someone “should” behave.

This shift aims to ensure that cases are decided on the facts, not on outdated or unfair assumptions.

10. Burden of Proof: Beyond Reasonable Doubt

In criminal cases, including rape, the prosecution must prove the defendant’s guilt “beyond reasonable doubt.” This is a high standard. It means that if the court or jury has any reasonable doubt about whether there was consent, or whether the accused reasonably believed there was consent, they must acquit.

• What does this mean in practice?
  Even if a victim is absolutely certain about what happened, the court must look at all the evidence and decide if it is sure—beyond reasonable doubt—that the offence occurred as alleged. This can be frustrating for victims, especially when there is little physical evidence or when accounts differ.

  
  

• Reasonable belief in consent:
  The law also asks whether the accused genuinely and reasonably believed the other person consented. The court will consider what steps, if any, the accused took to make sure there was consent. If the belief was not reasonable, or if no steps were taken, this can weigh against the defendant.

This high threshold is designed to protect against wrongful conviction, but it can make rape cases particularly challenging to prove.

11. Emotional Realities

The emotional impact of rape and the legal process can be profound for everyone involved.

• For victims:
  Feelings of shame, guilt, anger, or confusion are common. The process of reporting, giving evidence, and waiting for a decision can be exhausting. It’s important to remember that your reactions—whether you froze, complied, or contacted the accused afterwards—are normal trauma responses and do not mean you consented.

  
  

• For defendants:
  Facing an allegation of rape is life-changing. The stress, stigma, and uncertainty can be overwhelming, even if the case does not result in conviction. Both sides may feel isolated and misunderstood.

Seeking support—whether from trusted friends, family, or professionals—can help you cope with the process, whatever the outcome.

12. Conclusion

Rape cases are some of the most difficult and emotionally charged in the justice system. The law in England and Wales is clear: consent must be given freely, without coercion, pressure, or fear. Courts are increasingly aware of the complexities of trauma, the dangers of relying on myths, and the importance of evidence—both of what happened and of any patterns of behaviour.

If you are unsure about your experience, or worried about how your actions will be judged, know that you are not alone. The process is challenging, but your feelings are valid. Evidence matters, but so does your wellbeing. If you want to show a pattern of behaviour, gather what you can—messages, records, or witnesses. And if you are struggling, reach out for support.

Justice is not always straightforward, but understanding how the system works can help you navigate it with more confidence and clarity.

Evidence Checklist for Rape or Sexual Assault Cases

Tips for Gathering and Presenting Evidence

• Keep everything: Save messages, notes, and any records—even if they seem minor.

• Write down your account: As soon as possible, note what happened, how you felt, and anything you remember.

• Seek medical help: If you’re injured or distressed, medical records can be important.

• Tell someone you trust: Early disclosures to friends or family can support your account.

• Preserve physical evidence: If possible, keep clothing or items from the incident.

• Don’t worry about perfection: Trauma can affect memory and behaviour. Courts understand inconsistencies may occur.

•