Upload your documents, statements, or evidence to Caira and ask questions about your case. Caira is privacy-first—if you can think it, you can ask it, without judgement. Caira can help you spot inconsistencies, highlight potential issues, and prepare draft representations or letters—so you can make informed decisions about your next steps. Get practical support, clarity, and confidence before charges are considered. Start now
Why the Pre-Charge Stage Matters in Drug Cases
Drugs offences—such as possession, supply, production, or importation—are often based on physical evidence, witness statements, forensic analysis, and the context of the alleged activity. The pre-charge stage is vital for clarifying the facts, challenging assumptions, and preventing unnecessary prosecution. Drug cases frequently turn on the interpretation of intent: was the quantity consistent with personal use or supply? Was the suspect aware of the substance? Were the circumstances of discovery lawful? These are questions that can be addressed effectively before charges are brought, and early intervention can make a decisive difference.
The CPS must satisfy both the evidential test (a realistic prospect of conviction) and the public interest test before authorising a charge. In drug cases, both tests can be challenged. If you can show that the quantity was for personal use, that the substance was not what the police assumed, or that the search and seizure were unlawful, the case may not proceed. Proactive engagement at this stage—gathering evidence, making representations, and requesting further enquiries—gives you the best chance of a favourable outcome.
Requesting Disclosure
At the pre-charge stage, you should make targeted requests for the material underpinning the allegation. Understanding what the police are relying on is essential for preparing your response. Consider requesting:
Police reports and officer notebooks detailing the stop, search, and seizure
Witness statements from officers, informants, or bystanders
Forensic analysis of the substance—type, quantity, and purity
CCTV footage from the scene of the stop or alleged supply
Digital communications—texts, social media messages, or call records said to evidence supply or distribution
Details of the search—grounds for the search, authority (e.g., warrant, PACE powers), and any irregularities
Financial evidence—cash seized, bank records, or lifestyle evidence relied upon by investigators
Even partial disclosure can reveal weaknesses. For example, if the forensic report shows a substance that is not controlled, or if the quantity is inconsistent with supply, the foundation of the case is undermined. Record all requests in writing.
Written Representations: Key Arguments
Written representations in drug cases should be factual, structured, and focused on the evidence. The most effective representations will:
Challenge intent to supply: The distinction between possession and supply is often the central issue. If the quantity is consistent with personal use, there is no paraphernalia associated with dealing (scales, deal bags, multiple phones, large amounts of cash), and there is no evidence of onward supply (texts, surveillance, witness accounts), set this out clearly. The prosecution must prove intent to supply beyond reasonable doubt, and circumstantial evidence alone may not be sufficient.
Highlight lawful possession or prescription: If the substance was lawfully prescribed, or if you had a legitimate reason for possession (e.g., medication for a medical condition, substances purchased abroad that are legal in the country of origin), provide documentary proof. Prescription records, medical letters, and pharmacy receipts can all be decisive.
Challenge the forensic evidence: Not every substance seized by the police turns out to be controlled. If the forensic analysis has not been completed, or if the substance is not what the police assumed, the evidential test fails. Request full forensic results and check for contamination or errors in the analysis.
Raise procedural errors: Drug cases are frequently challenged on the basis of unlawful search and seizure. If the police stopped you without reasonable grounds, searched you or your property without a valid warrant or PACE authority, or failed to follow proper procedures (e.g., not recording the grounds for the search, not providing a record of the search), the evidence obtained may be inadmissible. Set out the procedural requirements and identify any breach.
Assert mistaken identity or lack of knowledge: If the drugs were found in a shared space (a car, a house, a workplace), the prosecution must prove that you knew about them and had control. If someone else had access, or if you had no knowledge of the substance, present this clearly with supporting evidence.
Request further lines of enquiry: If the police have not interviewed key witnesses, obtained CCTV, or analysed digital evidence, request that they do. The officer in charge must pursue all reasonable lines of enquiry (Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996).
Common Grounds for Dismissal
Drug cases can be effectively challenged at the pre-charge stage on a number of grounds:
No evidence of intent to supply: If the quantity is consistent with personal use, and there is no supporting evidence of supply (paraphernalia, financial evidence, communications), the more serious charge should not be pursued.
Forensic evidence does not support the allegation: If the substance is not controlled, the analysis is incomplete, or there is evidence of contamination, the case cannot proceed.
Contradictory or unreliable witness statements: If the officer's account of the stop and search is inconsistent, or if key witnesses are unavailable or unreliable, the evidential test is weakened.
Procedural errors—unlawful search or seizure: If the search was conducted without proper authority or in breach of PACE Codes, the evidence may be excluded. This is one of the most effective grounds for challenge in drug cases.
Public interest test not met: For minor possession, first-time allegations, or cases involving personal use of small quantities, the CPS may conclude that prosecution is not in the public interest—especially if a caution or other disposal is more appropriate.
Important Evidence to Gather
The strength of your pre-charge position depends on the quality and completeness of your evidence. Start gathering material early:
Forensic reports detailing substance analysis, quantity, and purity
Prescription records or medical documentation for lawful possession
Witness statements from people who can confirm personal use, shared access, or lack of knowledge
CCTV footage or phone videos from the scene
Evidence of lawful purchase or importation (receipts, customs documents)
Records of the stop and search—including the officer's stated grounds and any paperwork provided
Digital evidence—phone records, messages, and call logs that may support your account or undermine the prosecution narrative
Nuanced Considerations
Drugs cases often hinge on the interpretation of "intent to supply." The prosecution may rely on the quantity seized, the presence of paraphernalia, financial evidence, or digital communications. However, each of these can be explained innocently. Bulk purchases for personal use, cash from legitimate sources, and messages taken out of context are all common features of cases that ultimately do not proceed. If you can provide a clear, documented explanation, supported by evidence, the assumption of intent can be dismantled.
It is also worth noting that the lawfulness of the search is often the weakest point in a drug case. The police must have reasonable grounds for a stop and search, and must follow the requirements of PACE Code A. If the search was based on appearance, location, or vague suspicion rather than specific, objective grounds, this can be challenged. Similarly, if a warrant was obtained on the basis of unreliable information, or if the conditions of the warrant were not met, the search may be unlawful and the evidence excluded.
If the police have not pursued reasonable lines of enquiry—for example, failed to investigate prescription status, ignored evidence of shared access, or did not obtain CCTV—reference this in your representations. The officer in charge must retain and disclose all relevant material (see Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996). Investigative gaps weaken the evidential test and support arguments for no further action.
Precedent and Practice
The CPS charging decision is governed by the Code for Crown Prosecutors, requiring both evidential and public interest tests. In drug cases, the CPS must carefully assess the evidence of intent, the circumstances of discovery, and the proportionality of prosecution. Early, detailed representations can persuade the CPS that the evidential test is not met, especially if you can provide independent evidence or highlight weaknesses in the prosecution case. The public interest test is also significant, particularly for minor possession or first-time offences.
If you are under investigation for a drug offence, do not wait for formal charges. Prepare a clear timeline of events, gather all relevant documents, and identify witnesses who can support your explanation. Challenge any assumptions made by investigators, request further lines of enquiry, and highlight any procedural errors or gaps in the evidence. Uploading your documents and correspondence to Caira can help you organise your material, spot inconsistencies, and draft strong representations.
How People Use Caira for Drug Offence Investigations
People facing drug offence investigations use Caira to take practical steps towards resolving their situation. Common goals include:
Working towards having a case dropped before charges: Uploading police correspondence, stop-and-search records, and forensic reports to identify procedural errors or evidential weaknesses and prepare draft representations aimed at no further action.
Building a defence strategy: Analysing the evidence, challenging assumptions about intent to supply, and organising prescription records, witness statements, or evidence of shared access to present a clear account.
Preparing representations to the CPS: Drafting structured submissions that highlight unlawful search procedures, forensic gaps, or alternative explanations—with the aim of persuading the CPS not to proceed.
Requesting varied bail conditions: Reviewing bail paperwork and drafting written requests where conditions may be disproportionate or causing undue hardship.
Seeking early resolution: Identifying opportunities to engage with investigators to close matters early, especially where evidence is weak or a caution or alternative disposal may be more appropriate.
Disclaimer: This article is general information only and does not constitute legal, financial, or tax advice.
